Analyzed Questionnaire Responses
I have analysed the responses of the feedback from my questionnaire below which has helped me to improve the production of my documentary and ancillary product.
This summary of the responses from the a question on whether my documentary was informative shows that out of 22 responses, 95.5% said that is was very informative with 4.5% (one person) stating they believe it was quite informative. This was helpful by portraying to me that there is enough facts, figures and statistics in this documentary as nobody replied clicking the box for 'not informative'.
This question asked whether the individual would watch the rest of the documentary and the results received were very promising. 90.5% out of 21 people replied saying they would definitely continue to watch the rest of the documentary. One response stated they would 'probably' watch the rest and the other person stated 'if I was interested in housing I would'. I can understand that the content of my documentary would not be appealing to everybody in my target audience due to their interests and cultural competencies and therefore I am pleased with the responses.

This response was to a question about the target audience, whether the documentary appropriately targets 21-30 year olds in the B-C demographic. The responses were short answers with 100% of people saying yes with other responses such as 'Yes you have done this well', 'yes I think so' and 'yes, and older people'. From these responses I can understand I have effectively kept the audience in mind when researching, planning and producing my documentary.


This question was particularly helpful for me to improve my documentary. I asked what improvements needed to be made to my documentary and the responses I received were short answers which I can make the amendments. One of the responses said to 'change the font and sound in the Leigh section'. I can understand how the music I chose may not be the most appropriate and will change it. Some of the responses outlined some issues with the editing in the interview scene such as 'theres one part of the interview with the coffee shop owner where the audio and visual is out of time', 'the editing in sams interview overlapped a little so it jolted slightly', 'the interview could be cut down a bit' and 'maybe put in some more cutaways over the top of the interview'. The interview scene was the last piece of footage I collected and I was aware it needed some changes so these responses have helped me to clearly state what I need to do to make it better. I will check the editing of the shots with how I put them together to ensure they are smooth and professional. I will also cut some of the footage out of the interview and add more cutaways over the top of the existing footage to make it more engaging for the audience.


These responses of the aspects the readers like about my documentary were useful for me to know which aspects worked well and to maybe expand those parts to other sections of the documentary. It also allows me to know which points I have achieved in with adhering to the codes and conventions of documentaries. Many of the responses stated they liked the range of shots which I tried hard to achieve so I am glad this has come across in the documentary. I will continue to add a larger range through the cutaways I am adding in, in the interview. Other responses stated that the documentary had 'good sound and image quality', 'interesting interviews' 'good lighting and good setting', 'the pace of editing was good' 'aesthetically pleasing', 'the typography used is really good and appropriate', 'the presenter is also very professional' and 'everything'. These aspects are vital for a documentary so am happy with the responses that my documentary is reaching these key elements.

Out of 22 responses, 100% stated that they believed the article for the listings outlines the documentary accordingly so I will therefore be able to put this straight onto my double page spread magazine listings.


The last question I asked was about their opinion and idea of what image I should have for my double page spread. I had a few ideas although I wanted to gain information on what my target audience would like. There was a range of ideas which were helpful, some of these included 'the presenter under a sold sign', 'a landscape of London', 'maybe use a plain background and use a variety of pictures on one half of the page'. These responses were good ideas and helpful but the most effective which I will choose (and which was the most popular) was having a shot of houses in Leigh. These responses included 'properties in Leigh', 'picture of either Leigh or London', 'maybe some houses', 'a picture of Leigh', 'general scenery', 'possibly a shot of Leigh to contrast the shot of London on the newspaper advert' and 'I think you should include an image of houses, as this is what your documentary is about!'.